U. Hawaii Cans Rainbow Logo Despite Charges of 'Homophobia'
'Sensitivity Training' Urged for Unreformed
'Heterophiles'
Eric Langborgh
Controversy often
surrounds a team when it changes logos, but when the University of Hawaii
changed theirs last month they drew the ire of political correctness. The
Rainbow Warriors have dropped the rainbow from their logo, much to the
consternation of the gay community, which has brought allegations of
"homophobia" against the university and called for enrollment in
reeducation classes.
Syndicated sports
columnist David Teel called UH "an institution that should embrace
diversity." "Instead, in a fit of paranoia," wrote Teel in an
opinion piece, "homophobes on campus are eliminating the rainbow because to
some it symbolizes gay pride and unity."
The dispute erupted
following remarks made by UH Athletic Director Hugh Yoshida during the new logo’s
unveiling. "That [rainbow] logo really put a stigma on our program at
times," Yoshida noted, "in regards to it’s part of the gay
community, their flags and so forth."
"A statement
like that I can understand coming from student athletes," asserted Ken
Miller of the off-campus Gay and Lesbian Community Center (GLCC), "but to
come from the athletic director, I am surprised and disappointed."
In response to
allegations that his statement was prompted by homophobia, Yoshida contended
that his comments were taken out of context. As he had pointed out at the time
those comments were spoken, other groups also created confusion with the use of
the rainbow in their emblems—at least from a marketing standpoint—including
Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition and NASCAR driver Jeff Gordon’s Rainbow
Warrior racing team. Still, the school felt compelled to issue an apology
"to anyone who was offended," saying that it was not their intent.
David Franklin, the
editor of Outlook, a quarterly publication of the local gay and lesbian
community, contends that discrimination was indeed Yoshida’s and other school
officials’ intent. "The first thing out of their mouth was how when they
go to California the kids are always being teased about the rainbow,"
Franklin alleged, "because in California the kids there know what [the
rainbow] means."
Campus
Report has since
learned that Yoshida and others from the university have met with a campus task
force on sexual orientation and with the GLCC. In addition, UH has "agreed
on further meetings to discuss ‘sensitivity training,’" said campus
spokesman Jim Manke.
"We worked to
continue to put the resources together to make sure that these kinds of things
don’t happen on campus," stated Franklin, "and to expand all their
currently in-place non-discriminatory policies." Franklin explained to Campus
Report that those "things" referred to "any kind
of sexual orientation discrimination."
The steps to be taken
by the university to ensure this "non-discrimination" are as follows:
· continue discussion on how to expand "training
opportunities on civil rights and diversity," such as those offered by the
GLCC and other student services pilot programs;
· conduct "an assessment of campus climate
diversity issues among the student athletes";
· and, implement plans that will be recommended in
the future "to make campuses safe and welcoming for gay, lesbian, bisexual,
and transgendered students and employees."
According to Miller,
"This is a good beginning."
Dollars and Identity, Not Fear
Despite much speculation that the rainbow insignia on
team uniforms was hindering recruitment efforts, especially for coach June Jones’
football team, campus officials and the creator of the new logo assert that
marketing goals and the desire to find a consistent, unifying look to UH’s
sports programs were the main concerns in designing the new logo.
Manke confessed that
recruitment of student athletes was "probably one element in marketing
strategy," but divulged that there were "no studies I’m aware
of" that explored that issue. Instead, the school’s rainbow logo
"had caused confusion" for marketing for the reasons stated above.
In fact, other
educational institutions have gone much further than UH to avoid this confusion
of association—even so far as to change the school name. Dyke College in
Cleveland, Ohio changed its name in 1995 to avoid its embarrassing association
with the slang term for lesbian. Beaver College in Pennsylvania, fed up with the
derogatory comments hurled its way due to their name’s association with the
rodent and the vulgar term for a female body part, has begun the process of
changing its name. Beaver College officials noted that the ridicule cut into
their bottom line; thirty percent of prospective students polled said they
wouldn’t consider attending the school, and Internet filters have been found
to block out Beaver College’s website and emails, due to its name. Marketing
confusion has also prompted schools like the University of Rio Grande (in Ohio)
and Belleville Area College—students joked that the acronym stood for Bring
All Crayons—to change their names, as well.
The predominant
reason stated by UH officials for changing its logo is to eliminate the oft-used
rainbow in favor of an emblem unique to UH. "The university represents the
entire state," logo designer Kurt Osaki told Campus
Report. "Cal does not put a bear on their logo; they use a
‘C.’"
Osaki and his firm,
Osaki Design, have made a huge splash in the sports world by designing the Tampa
Bay Buccaneers’ and Baltimore Ravens’ uniform logos, among others. The UH
alum came up with a catchy Polynesian-style "H" as the new logo for
his alma mater.
This new logo will
adorn the uniforms of all UH sports teams, as well as those teams’ stadiums
and arenas, unlike the previous chaos that marked UH sports identity.
"Teams were doing their own thing," each with its own uniform and
logo, explained Osaki. "There was no real guide which said ‘this is the
university color; this is the university logo.’"
These explanations
don’t sit well with gay activists, though, who claim that the university is
attempting to foster "a new heterosexual image," as Teel characterized
it. However, as school officials point out, the use of the rainbow itself in the
logo is relatively new in UH history, first appearing in the 1980s after being
present in name only since 1923. The change in name to "Rainbow
Warriors" from simply "Rainbows" in 1974 was made not to put
forth a heterosexual image, per se, but to combat the school’s apparent
pro-homosexual image, as pointed out in a mid-1960s student newspaper editorial.
Franklin conceded as
much in saying, "If you come from another state and you see a rainbow you
think it’s a gay organization."
"When you change
logos there is always a certain amount of resistance to change," Manke
explained to Campus Report.
"This has only intensified due to the side-issue with the gay
community."
"We’re just trying to get a
new image out there," Yoshida said in defending the new logo. Nevertheless,
this new image displaces an old image that gay activists had sought to preserve.
Apparently, these activists’ suggested penalty for that transgression is
"sensitivity training." Their opponents maintain that the
corresponding cost of implementing that penalty is a loss of freedom of thought
and discourse: the very essence of university education.
|