News

“The findings reveal that students attending schools in which bullying prevention programs are implemented are more likely to have experienced peer victimization, compared to those attending schools without bullying prevention.”

Proponents of early childhood education may sing its praises but reality keeps rearing its ugly head.

A recent debate at Georgetown University’s Law School on U. S. intelligence gathering showed some surprising divisions over current policies and practices.

When government agencies consider the need for education reform, they usually come up with the same solution for the woes of public schools: more money. Nevertheless, buried in their reports are nuggets of information that contradict that thesis.

When you get right down to it, the institutions that cry the loudest for diversity, particularly in academia, aren’t that diverse themselves.

Those of us who track academic bias have long been plagued by a nagging question: when did it start?

Perhaps a former vice-presidential candidate was right when he said that there are two Americas. From what we’ve found, there is the one we live in, and the one that is studied in academia.

Academics say, and do, the darndest things. This year…

This latest incident offered a couple of narratives that the media preferred to ignore.

It is startling to compare the hubris of college administrators with the humility of combat veterans.

Their professors may still love it, but college students are going negative on Obamacare and the president whose name is often attached to it.

None of the teachers who wrote their take on education policy and reform could ever agree on a single issue, such as teacher layoffs, seniority and standardized testing.